Hoodism

Landian who likes mysticism which seems to be the basic principle of former communists who became landians.
If you aren’t cultured in my schizophrenic landianisms -> Quarkism (thanks for nothing ever)

Short History Lesson

Did the past really happen? Are we certain the dinosaurs even existed? Kant would say no, or at least that, if there were something to know, it would be that humanity is the predecessor of all life on Earth. We are the primal intelligence of the terrestrial plane. After all, nothing can precede being, not even time. Time is inherently linked to being; the subject of the subject could not have existed before the subject that allowed the subject to be the subject. As Meillassoux demonstrates: " Consequently, all that correlationism can say about ancestrality is that it is a subjective representation of such a past- but that this past couldn’t really have existed in itself with all its objects and events. Correlationism will generally maintain- because it is subtle- that ancestral statements are true in a way- i.e., as universal statements, bearing on some present experiences about specific materials (starlight, isotope). But if it is consistent, correlationism will have to deny that the referents of these statements really existed as described prior to any human or living species. For the correlationist, ancestrality cannot be a reality prior to the subject- it can only be a reality that is said and thought by the subject as prior to the subject. It is a past for humanity which has no more effectiveness than that of a past of humanity that is strictly correlated with actual humans." This supposes a time without being—a time without man. Something a humanist could never admit to without their ultracalvinist experiment falling apart into rubble. The humanist (the progressive, the modern liberal, etc.) is positioned to believe that the intersubjective community is something that must be defended before oneself: give up your work. It doesn’t belong to you anymore. Instead, give it to the horde of domestication—the horde controlled by mad dogs obsessed with bureaucratizing and blotting out the only thing holding back the madhouse. So, at the ground level, we experience what we call politics: war. Join a biker gang, because time is running out. What I and many neoreactionaries mean by this is that human rights and other humanistic ideas all have to come from somewhere; hence, they seem very transcendental to us (as Kant himself admitted: out of this world). They seem all too close to heaven’s God-given rights. That’s because, well—it is. Modern liberalism is the direct descendant of Puritanism. As Land has said "To comprehend the emergence of our contemporary predicament, characterized by relentless, totalizing, state expansion, the proliferation of spurious positive ‘human rights’ (claims on the resources of others backed by coercive bureaucracies), politicized money, reckless evangelical ‘wars for democracy’, and comprehensive thought control arrayed in defense of universalistic dogma (accompanied by the degradation of science into a government public relations function), it is necessary to ask how Massachusetts came to conquer the world, as Moldbug does. With every year that passes, the international ideal of sound governance finds itself approximating more closely and rigidly to the standards set by the Grievance Studies departments of New England universities. This is the divine providence of the ranters and levelers, elevated to a planetary teleology, and consolidated as the reign of the Cathedral." What this all falls back on is the state. Because there is no longer a god here, since everything has been secularized, the state must formalize the approval of these philosophical positions, such as human rights. But in almost all cases, they are used for violence. This state, being very much a god for humanism, is also an evil god. This god cannot sustain itself; it has become blotted with bureaucratic nonsense. Have you seen the media empire? Yet this actually came from a well-intentioned view; it came from the Mugwumps, who believed the media could be used for good and influence the government in ways that helped society. But it failed, as evil men always find their way into positions of power when allowed to. (and since) Bureaucratic states are heavily based upon that media foundation, and so the states themselves have little power in any real sense, as everything is so diffused that power sits constantly on the edge of absolute anarchy. Still, this mess of a state continues scrambling to control most of the world. Nobody is truly free from the U.S.; everyone is in debt to it in one form or another. African countries, for instance, are stapled to the side of the body that is American imperialism. The U.S. managed to achieve this after winning two world wars; history is, after all, written by the victors. WIP